Peer Review Proses

All manuscripts submitted to Khatulistiwa Smart: Journal of Artificial Intelligence must follow the focus, scope, and author guidelines of this journal. Submitted manuscripts must have scientific merit or novelty appropriate to the journal's focus and scope. All manuscripts must be free from plagiarism. All authors are advised to use plagiarism detection software to check for similarities. Editors will check for plagiarism in articles submitted to this journal using Plagiarism Checker software or Mendeley software; for more details, see the Plagiarism Check menu.

Research articles submitted to this journal will be reviewed by at least 2 (two) or more expert reviewers. The articles will undergo a Double-Blind Peer Review Process and will be returned to the authors for revision. Reviewers provide valuable scientific comments to improve the manuscript's content. All manuscripts are subject to peer review, and authors can expect a decision, or an explanation for any delay, within two months of submission. The corresponding author should submit the revised manuscript within two weeks if a revision is requested. Principal Editors make the final decision based on the information obtained through the peer review process.

As explained in our publication ethics, we ensure that reviewed manuscripts are treated confidentially before publication.

The final decision on article acceptance will be made by the Editors based on the reviewers' comments. The publication of accepted articles, including their sequence, will be managed by the Editor in Chief, considering the acceptance date sequence, the geographical distribution of authors, and thematic issues.